even with temperature and such under control compared to the stock cooling solution on the regular Fury.) (Supposedly also proven by how Fury X GPU models generally can be clocked higher - and with less voltage increase required. It is also Fury GPU and not a Fury X (Though similar to how Nvidia does not allow changes to their Titan GPU models there are no custom FuryX models to compare against directly short of people flashing Fury GPU's successfully to the same specs as the X model by unlocking them.) anyways so it won't be top-quality I'd imagine, particularly also because the bios firmware flash to enable disabled compute units or what they were, clusters?, anyway it seems this GPU has a high chance of having actual faulty ones instead of just being locked or disabled.
) and some PCB changes whatever those could be for, stability perhaps but that's all buried in marketing speech.
#ASIC QUALITY GPU Z PLUS#
Personally I actually haven't used GPU-z in a long time, last time I tried was when I had almost just built this original system with it's 6970 based GPU I think it was, caused a BSOD whenever I tried to run it (Even after testing when a updated version of it came out.) so I never used it since, probably fine now but still a bit wary as a result plus I'm not too bothered by it although I'd imagine this particular Fury model would be above average in quality since it's a later introduced model when fabs were better though that doesn't necessarily mean it's correct, besides Sapphire EOL'ed it I believe in favor for a even newer refresh (Model is called "Nitro" now.) with a slightly tweaked cooling design (The "butt plate" part of the cooling sink that sticks out over the PCB has a different design on it's shroud cover.